NEW LISTINGS Movie posters

Elvis Presley Movie Poster ExhibitionCarry On Movie Poster ExhibitionClint Eastwood Movie postersAbbott and Costello Movie postersSurfing Movie PostersAlfred Hitchcock Movie poster ExhibitionMarilyn Monroe Movie PostersHammer Horror ExhibitionJames Bond Movie Poster

Movie posters for Australian FilmsWake in Fright Daybill Movie posterNickel Queen Daybill Movie posterStone Daybill Movie PosterYou Cant See Round Corners Movie posterSeven Little Australians Daybill Movie posterPicnic at Hanging Rock Daybill Movie posterDemonstrator Daybill Movie posterThe Castle Original Movie posterHarmony Row Australian DaybillSunday Too Far Away Movie posterBush Christmas Daybill Movie PosterSlim Dusty Daybill Movie posterWolf Creek 2 Movie Poster

« Blog Home

Posted on 31 Mar 2012 8:34 PM

Where a full colour daybill is known to exist, many dealers and collectors have often routinely made the assumption that one or two colour daybills for the same title must be resissues.
It is certainly true that there are many examples of one or two colour daybills that are indeed reissues but there is usually some evidence to indicate this ie printers details, censorship logos, etc.
The fact is that there are many cases where a one colour version of a poster was produced in addition to the full colour version for the original release. Unfortunately, there is not much "evidence" in the form of pressbooks and general information about the origins of Australian posters. Pronouncements about the origins of Australian daybills are often based on anecdotal information or best guesses.
One example of a poster that has been assumed as being a 40s or even 50s reissue is the White Cargo one colour daybill. The film was released in 1942 and starred Hedy Lamarr and Walter Pidgeon - "I am Tondelayo!". A full colour daybill was produced so many dealers have just assumed that the one colour daybill must be a reissue.
 Have a good look at the two posters side by side and read on below for the reasons why they were almost certainly both produced for the original release of the film.
It is quite obvious that the same artwork/plates were used for the two posters with the exception that the poster on the right is just a one colour version. Censor details are the same. Both posters were printed by Marchant. Marchant & Co Offset printers Sydney printed posters up until about 1942/3. That would indicate that the two posters were most likely printed for the original release of the film.
We do know that cinemas were charged a fee for posters. I actually have old copies of invoices that were sent to cinemas with details of how much they were charged for each poster. It is possible that the one colour version was printed as a cheaper alternative to the full colour version but we can only really make an educated guess about this.
There are many similar examples. There are also one colour daybills that exist in the absence of any known full colour daybills.
So, just if you come across a one colour Australian daybill don't automatically assume it is a reissue.

» Posted in MOVIE POSTER NEWS  |  Add Comment


Add Comment

Please enter your username or email address and password. If you have not registered before, also enter a screen name; this will be displayed with your comments. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

* Email Address / Username
* Password
New? Enter your screen name here.
Screen name
* Comments:
Please enter the code you see in the image on the left into the box above. Note: This is case sensitive. e.g 'h' is different to 'H'